Nearly two weeks ago, Timothy Muris, chairman of the
Federal Trade Commission (FTC), outlined a new "ambitious,
positive, pro-privacy agenda" for the United States that focused on three areas: 1) increased
enforcement of existing privacy provisions; 2) new initiatives such as controlling spam
and creating a national "Do Not Call" list for people to opt out of telemarketing calls;
and 3) a retreat from previous moves to establish legislation to protect online privacy.
In a new brief, Forrester Research (Nasdaq: FORR) made its
feelings about the FTC's new agenda clear: It "pours gasoline on the fires of the
privacy debate ... a company that thinks that the FTC's backing off of legislation
means that the issue will go away is sadly mistaken. Instead, addressing privacy one
technology or business practice at a time only adds to the confusion."
What It Really Means
Forrester did not hold back in its criticism of the FTC. The commission's new approach,
the consulting firm said, will backfire in a number of ways.
First, instead of keeping the privacy debate limited to the Web, the new agenda will
expand the debate to firms' offline practices. "By taking on telemarketing in
this new agenda, the FTC has expanded the scope of the privacy debate to include existing
offline practices," Forrester said.
Second, as the FTC launches its new agenda, it has failed to present an overarching
framework. "This means that businesses are left out in the
cold with no clear guidelines for what is acceptable," Forrester said.
Finally, Forrester concluded, the FTC's new direction will only embolden privacy
advocates and, worse, will give them even more ammunition by expanding the debate to
offline telemarketing. "By putting this much emphasis on privacy, the FTC has only
validated the claims of watchdogs ... [and] advocates will continue to highlight
companies' errant practices in their press releases and news conferences."
Measures Business Must Take
For companies fearful of being accused of playing fast and loose with customer
information, Forrester did offer some guidelines for protecting themselves
from "what easily could be a multimillion-dollar PR nightmare." This risk, coupled with
the new uncertainty in policy, "makes it even more important for companies to clearly
assess the risks and costs of their data practices and systematically update and enforce
their privacy policies."
The Forrester brief recommended the following:
- Anoint a chief privacy officer. The CPO will serve as the focal point for developing
systems and best practices in customer information handling. This is not to say that a
company must develop a whole new level of bureaucracy to accompany the new position,
Forrester said. "Successful CPOs at companies like IBM and Microsoft
have leveraged
existing systems and personnel."
- Assess exposure. Audit and document online and offline privacy practices to
create an enterprise-wide view of how data is used and shared.
- Regularly review privacy policies. "Many firms have policies that were thrown up in
the late 1990s and have been collecting dust since then," Forrester said. Clearly, this
is not the best tack to follow.
- Develop a PR action plan. Companies need to assume a worst-case scenario about
possible privacy violations being made public, then plan how to address subsequent PR
fallout. "The strategy should include a clear escalation process, an accurate statement
on the privacy practices of the organization and an education plan for the executives
involved," Forrester said.
|